<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Investing to Wealth &#187; Money Morning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.macroaxis.com/category/money-morning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.macroaxis.com</link>
	<description>Macroaxis Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:51:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Tech Stocks to Watch: Apple Inc. (Nasdaq: AAPL), Research in Motion (Nasdaq: RIMM), Guidewire Software</title>
		<link>http://blog.macroaxis.com/2012/01/23/tech-stocks-to-watch-apple-inc-nasdaq-aapl-research-in-motion-nasdaq-rimm-guidewire-software/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.macroaxis.com/2012/01/23/tech-stocks-to-watch-apple-inc-nasdaq-aapl-research-in-motion-nasdaq-rimm-guidewire-software/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 22:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kerri Shannon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AAPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple computer stock symbol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple inc stock history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple inc. (nasdaq: aapl)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple stock history chart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple stock history graph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple stock market price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple stock price per share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple stock price quote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple stock prices history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple stocks history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of apple stock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOOG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[how much is apple stock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kerri Shannon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Morning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research in Motion Ltd. (Nasdaq: RIMM)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIMM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech stocks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneymorning.com/?p=62076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Research in Motion Ltd. (Nasdaq: <a target="_blank" href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ:RIMM">RIMM</a>)</strong>, <strong>Apple Inc. (Nasdaq: <a target="_blank" href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ:AAPL">AAPL</a>)</strong>,<strong> </strong>and a software company's IPO round out  the biggest headline-making <a target="_blank" href="http://moneymorning.com/2011/12/20/investing-in-tech-stocks-in-2012-new-opportunities-arise-from-scrapped-att-deal/">tech  stocks</a> this week - but not all are "Buys." <br /><br />
<strong>Major change for RIM:</strong> Research in Motion, the struggling Blackberry smartphone maker, has named a new  Chief Executive Officer to replace co-CEOS Mike Lazaridis and Jim Balsillie - but  could be too little, too late for RIM. <br /><br />
The  company announced Monday morning that RIM-insider Thorsten Heins would take  over the reins effective immediately. Lazaridis will stay on as vice chairman of the board; Balsillie will stay  as a director. <br /><br />
Lazaridis  and Balsille have received intensifying shareholder backlash for failing to  effectively compete in the smartphone market, especially against Apple Inc.'s  iPhone. RIM's stock fell 75% last year as Apple and Google Inc. (Nasdaq: <a target="_blank" href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ:GOOG">GOOG</a>) dominated the  industry. RIM's share of the global smartphone market sank to 11% in the third  quarter from 15% a year earlier. <br /><br />
Heins  has been RIM's chief operating officer since 2008. He's said there's no need  for a drastic change of plans to get RIM back on track - although industry  consensus says otherwise. He's also not known for innovation - a reason the  leadership replacement might not do any good for flailing RIM. <br /><br />
"Heins  is a product execution guy, he's not a visionary," Ehud Gelblum, an analyst  with Morgan Stanley (NYSE: <a target="_blank" href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:MS">MS</a>),  told <strong><em>Bloomberg  News</em></strong>. "Heins has to give people a reason why they need a BlackBerry.  It's going to be very difficult for him." <br /><br />
Research  in Motion stock fell 8.58% Monday to close at $15.54. <br /><br />
<strong><em><a href="http://moneymorning.com/2012/01/23/tech-stocks-to-watch-apple-inc-nasdaq-aapl-research-in-motion-nasdaq-rimm-guidewire-software/" target="_self">Click here to continue reading...</a></em></strong><br /><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.macroaxis.com/2012/01/23/tech-stocks-to-watch-apple-inc-nasdaq-aapl-research-in-motion-nasdaq-rimm-guidewire-software/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Ultimate Fate of the Keystone Pipeline</title>
		<link>http://blog.macroaxis.com/2012/01/23/the-ultimate-fate-of-the-keystone-pipeline/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.macroaxis.com/2012/01/23/the-ultimate-fate-of-the-keystone-pipeline/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 10:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Kent Moors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EISA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keystone oil pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keystone pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keystone pipeline capacity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keystone pipeline contractors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keystone pipeline project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keystone pipeline route]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keystone pipeline xl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keystone xl pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Morning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transcanada keystone pipeline]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneymorning.com/?p=61981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Obama Administration last week decided not to approve the Keystone XL  pipeline. <br />
  <br />
  This has introduced another political firestorm into an already uncertain  market. <br />
  <br />
  If there is one subject that is likely to stimulate more angst over economic  recovery prospects, it is <u>the availability of energy</u>.<br />
  <br />
  Energy is central in everything that happens in the U.S. market.<br />
  <br />
  And Keystone is designed to transport up to 700,000 barrels of oil a day from  Alberta to refineries on the U.S. Gulf coast. It represents a new North  American-centered initiative to lessen reliance on Middle Eastern imports and  would create thousands of new jobs.<br />
  <br />
  <em>It also would create new opportunities for investors.</em><br />
  <br />
  But the pipeline has had its detractors from the beginning. <br /><br />
<h3>Environmentalist  Concerns Reign </h3>
Environmental  concerns have been raised over the greenhouse gas emissions and passage of the  pipeline through ecologically sensitive areas. <br />
  <br />
  It is also opposed by those who view the current condition of virtually  guaranteed crude oil price increases as an opportunity to invest in alternative  and renewable energy technologies. <br />
  <br />
  Some of the environmental issues can be resolved by simply moving the pipeline  route. <br />
  <br />
  But others are more difficult to counter. <br />
  <br />
  The crude involved is very heavy oil, primarily from the Athabasca oil sands  and similar deposits in Alberta and Saskatchewan. That raw material requires  upgrading to synthetic oil and that is far more environmentally invasive than  processing lightweight crude. <br />
  <br />
  Therefore, proponents of the pipeline can't resolve environmental concerns  simply by changing the route. <br />
  <br />
  And then there is the added problem of a current U.S. statute, namely, &#167;526 of  the Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) of 2007. This prohibits federal  agencies from procuring (which includes importing) synthetic fuel unless its  life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions are less than those for conventional  petroleum sources.<br />
  <br />
  The "life-cycle" considers the GHG emissions throughout the  extraction and processing of the oil - that is, from the time it is taken out  of the ground, through its transport and upgrading, to its delivery to a  refinery (and its emissions there). <br />
  <br />
  When originally passed, this section was designed to benefit domestic American  producers over the import of heavier and higher sulfur content foreign oil. It  was never intended to create a problem with our neighbors to the north.<br /><br />
  Unfortunately, we sure have a problem now. <br /><br />
  
  <strong><em><a href="http://moneymorning.com/2012/01/23/the-ultimate-fate-of-the-keystone-pipeline/" target="_self">To continue reading, please click here...</a></em></strong><a href="http://moneymorning.com/2012/01/23/the-ultimate-fate-of-the-keystone-pipeline/"><br />
  </a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.macroaxis.com/2012/01/23/the-ultimate-fate-of-the-keystone-pipeline/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Hundred Billion Reasons to Invest in Robotics Technology</title>
		<link>http://blog.macroaxis.com/2012/01/23/a-hundred-billion-reasons-to-invest-in-robotics-technology/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.macroaxis.com/2012/01/23/a-hundred-billion-reasons-to-invest-in-robotics-technology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 10:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Robinson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOOG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Morning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSFT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Premium Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robotics Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science and technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space exploration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneymorning.com/?p=61973</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here's a 100 billion reasons why space technology should  be on your radar screen -especially if you're interested in robotics. <br /><br />
According to the journal <strong><em>Nature</em></strong><em>,</em> the Milky Way Galaxy <em>alone</em> contains at least <a target="_blank" href="http://www.smartplanet.com/blog/science-scope/galaxy-has-at-least-100-billion-planets-says-new-estimate/12015">100 billion planets.</a><br /><br />
Now forgive me if I sound excited...but that is huge.<br /><br />
After all, just 20 years ago, astronomers still widel y  believed that our own tiny solar system contained <strong><em>all</em></strong>of the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.journaltimes.com/news/science/astronomers-see-more-planets-than-stars-in-galaxy/article_b6d77d4e-f486-5f8e-a831-cacc0105c97a.html">major planets</a>. <br /><br />
So when I talk about how we are entering an Era of Radical  Change, this is exactly what I'm talking about. <br /><br />
It's not about tiny incremental changes but gigantic shifts  in thought. <br /><br />
And here is something else to ponder... <br /><br />
With all of this new data, scientists now believe the  universe may contain more than 150 billion <a target="_blank" href="http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/ask_astro/answers/021127a.html">galaxies.</a>  The math is enough to make your head spin. <br /><br />
<h3>How Nuclear-Powered Robots Are Winning the New Space Race</h3>

All this brings to mind one key point: The odds that we are  alone in the universe grow  smaller  and smaller every day.<br /><br />
That puts us on the cusp of a New Space Race - one that will  undoubtedly favor   robots.<br /><br />
That's why I think NASA's new <a target="_blank" href="http://spidernaut.jsc.nasa.gov/default.asp">Spidernaut</a> is such an important piece of technology. It's an eight-legged robot that looks  like it crawled right out of a sci-fi movie. <br /><br />
NASA plans to use these robots to help  construct  a new generation of space-science platforms that are so large and  fragile they'll have to be built in orbit.<br /><br />
As it turns out, spiders are really nimble creatures. NASA  designed the prototype arachnid robot to have the grace and weight distribution  of real spiders. <br /><br />
If the technology works as planned, these giant spider  robots would crawl across a "web" of space tethers so as not to damage delicate  equipment.<br /><br />
Now how cool is that?... <br /><br />
It all goes to show you that despite the soft global economy  and budget cuts, we've actually never had more interest in space exploration.<br /><br />
But this time it's not just the United States and Russia.  Indeed, <a target="_blank" href="http://news.yahoo.com/china-reveals-space-plans-2016-095936319.html">China</a>, <a target="_blank" href="http://isro.org/">India</a> and <a target="_blank" href="http://www.jaxa.jp/index_e.html">Japan</a> are also funding major programs.<br /><br />
<strong><em><a href="http://moneymorning.com/2012/01/23/a-hundred-billion-reasons-to-invest-in-robotics-technology/" target="_self">To continue reading, please click here...</a></em></strong> <br /><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.macroaxis.com/2012/01/23/a-hundred-billion-reasons-to-invest-in-robotics-technology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Best &quot;Buy&quot; of the New Dividend Aristocrats</title>
		<link>http://blog.macroaxis.com/2012/01/23/the-best-buy-of-the-new-dividend-aristocrats/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.macroaxis.com/2012/01/23/the-best-buy-of-the-new-dividend-aristocrats/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 10:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kerri Shannon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dividend Aristocrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dividend stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dividend Yield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dividends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kerri Shannon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Morning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PEG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[s&p dividend aristocrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock qoute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneymorning.com/?p=61985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you are looking for a steady stream of safe  dividends in today's troubled markets, the list of "Dividend Aristocrats" is a  good place to start. <br /><br />
Compiled and tracked by Standard &#038; Poor's,  Dividend Aristocrats are companies that have consistently increased their  dividend payouts for 25 consecutive years. <br /><br />
Currently, there are 51 of them, including the 10  new Dividend Aristocrats added this year. <br /><br />
That offers yield conscious investors a choice of 51  solid companies with a reliable track record of providing guaranteed payments-<strong>even during volatile markets and down economic  cycles. </strong><br /><br />
"The problem with going for capital growth is that  you very often don't get it, and then you've got nothing - the investment just  sits there," said <strong><em>Money Morning</em></strong> Global Investing Specialist Martin Hutchinson. <br /><br />
"Dividends" Martin says, "are easy." <br /><br />
Not only are they easy, they're also increasing. <br /><br />
<h3>Dividends on the Rise in 2012</h3>
Standard &#038; Poor's reported that dividend  increases for all their indices in 2011 almost doubled the dividends paid in  2010. <br /><br />
Total dividend increases hit $50.2 billion last year  - an 89.2% rise over 2010's dividend increases of $26.5 billion - and are  expected to climb even higher in 2012. <br /><br />
That's welcome news for investors searching for  steady income sources in a zero-growth environment. <br /><br />
Few other assets - especially bonds - are expected  to deliver an increased payout this year. <br /><br />
"With 10-year Treasury bond yields below 2%, bonds  just don't give you the income they used to," said Hutchinson. "<a target="_blank" href="http://moneymorning.com/2012/01/12/four-dividend-stocks-to-put-money-in-your-pocket/">Dividend  stocks</a> can give you a better yield than bonds, and if you pick the right  ones, will provide both protection against inflation and a chance to share in  global economic growth. While they'll fluctuate with the market, dividend  stocks of attractive companies are thus really a three-fer." <br /><br />
Dividend Aristocrats even go a step further than  ordinary dividend stocks because of their lengthy payout history. <br /><br /> <img border="0" width="251" style="padding:5px" align="left" src="http://moneymorning.com/images2/DividendAristocrats.png" alt="Dividend Aristocrats" /> But before you dive into investing in these Dividend  Aristocrats, the list needs some scrutiny. <br /><br />
Even though all 51 Aristocrats are known for  increasing dividends, not all of them make for great investments in today's  market. <br /><br />

"All you have to do is figure out which companies  are run by sharpies - and are paying dividends out of capital - and which  companies have genuinely solid business models that aren't going away," said  Hutchinson. <br /><br />
In fact, there's only one of the freshly-minted  Aristocrats that you should add to your portfolio right now.<br /><br />
<strong><em><a href="http://moneymorning.com/2012/01/23/the-best-buy-of-the-new-dividend-aristocrats/" target="_self">To continue reading, please click here...</a></em></strong><br /><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.macroaxis.com/2012/01/23/the-best-buy-of-the-new-dividend-aristocrats/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Verdict Is In: End Congressional Perks</title>
		<link>http://blog.macroaxis.com/2012/01/20/the-verdict-is-in-end-congressional-perks/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.macroaxis.com/2012/01/20/the-verdict-is-in-end-congressional-perks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Simpkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congressional perks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[live like the rest of us.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Morning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneymorning.com/?p=61952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Three-day workweeks. A full pension. Retirement benefits.  Gym memberships. Car service. Free flights to anywhere in the world and travel  allowances worth thousands of dollars...<br /><br />
With so many Americans struggling to just find a job, isn't  time we put an end to Congressional perks like these? <br /><br />
That's the question <a target="_blank" href="http://moneymorning.com/2011/12/30/put-an-end-to-congressional-perks/">we  put to you</a> just a few short weeks ago. And we're happy to say the response  has been overwhelming. <br /><br />
We've been inundated with comments and responses. Here's  just a small sampling:


<strong><em><a href="http://moneymorning.com/2012/01/20/the-verdict-is-in-end-congressional-perks/">To continue reading, please click here...</a></em></strong><br /><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.macroaxis.com/2012/01/20/the-verdict-is-in-end-congressional-perks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Verdict Is In: End Congressional Perks</title>
		<link>http://blog.macroaxis.com/2012/01/20/the-verdict-is-in-end-congressional-perks-2/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.macroaxis.com/2012/01/20/the-verdict-is-in-end-congressional-perks-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Simpkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congressional perks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[live like the rest of us.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Morning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneymorning.com/?p=61952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Three-day workweeks. A full pension. Retirement benefits.  Gym memberships. Car service. Free flights to anywhere in the world and travel  allowances worth thousands of dollars...<br /><br />
With so many Americans struggling to just find a job, isn't  time we put an end to Congressional perks like these? <br /><br />
That's the question <a target="_blank" href="http://moneymorning.com/2011/12/30/put-an-end-to-congressional-perks/">we  put to you</a> just a few short weeks ago. And we're happy to say the response  has been overwhelming. <br /><br />
We've been inundated with comments and responses. Here's  just a small sampling:


<strong><em><a href="http://moneymorning.com/2012/01/20/the-verdict-is-in-end-congressional-perks/">To continue reading, please click here...</a></em></strong><br /><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.macroaxis.com/2012/01/20/the-verdict-is-in-end-congressional-perks-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2012 U.S. Dollar Outlook: How to Play A Short-Term Rally</title>
		<link>http://blog.macroaxis.com/2012/01/20/2012-u-s-dollar-outlook-how-to-play-a-short-term-rally-2/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.macroaxis.com/2012/01/20/2012-u-s-dollar-outlook-how-to-play-a-short-term-rally-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 15:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Larry D. Spears</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dollar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investor Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Larry D. Spears]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Morning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UDN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UUP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneymorning.com/?p=61947</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
					
						
				
					
			
				The U.S. dollar will start 2012  on an upswing - but don't let it fool you. 
  
  What we're seeing is only a short-term rally inspired by Europe's travails. In  the long-term, the U.S. Federal Reserve's loose monetary ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.macroaxis.com/2012/01/20/2012-u-s-dollar-outlook-how-to-play-a-short-term-rally-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crisis in the Eurozone: The Reality of the European Downgrades</title>
		<link>http://blog.macroaxis.com/2012/01/20/crisis-in-the-eurozone-the-reality-of-the-european-downgrades/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.macroaxis.com/2012/01/20/crisis-in-the-eurozone-the-reality-of-the-european-downgrades/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 10:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack Barnes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EFSF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European downgrades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Investing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IMF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MCO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Morning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SIV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneymorning.com/?p=61929</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It turned out to be a ruinous Friday the 13th  for Europe last week.<br /><br />
  After the close, <a target="_blank" href="http://moneymorning.com/2012/01/13/crisis-in-europe-prepare-for-repercussions-from-standard-poors-credit-rating-downgrades/">Standard  &#038; Poor's downgraded nine of the sovereign states</a> in the European Union  (EU).<br /><br />
  That included dropping Austria and France to AA+  status from their formerly lofty AAA rating.<br /><br />
  While the decision was expected, and will most  likely be followed by additional downgrades from the other rating agencies such  as Moody's Corp. (NYSE: <a target="_blank" href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=mco">MCO</a>)  and <a target="_blank" href="http://www.google.com/finance?cid=15408600">Fitch Ratings Inc.</a>,  it's the knock-on effects that will have larger implications for investors  around the world.<br /><br />
<h3>In the Wake of the European Downgrades</h3>
The first and most obvious effect was the downgrade  of the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.efsf.europa.eu/about/index.htm">European Financial  Stability Facility</a> (EFSF) that followed on Monday. In the wake of Friday's  bad news, the EFSF was also dropped to a AA+ rating.<br /><br />
  According to the S&#038;P: <br /><br />
  <blockquote><em>"We  consider that credit enhancements that would offset what we view as the  now-reduced creditworthiness of the EFSF's guarantors and securities backing  the EFSF's issues are currently not in place. We have therefore lowered to  'AA+' the issuer credit rating of the EFSF, as well as the issue ratings on its  long-term debt securities."</em></blockquote>
The S&#038;P also warned more EFSF downgrades would  follow if the ratings of other individual states dropped in the future.<br /><br />
  In a warning the EFSF could fall below AA+ the  S&#038;P said: <br /><br />
 <blockquote> <em>"Conversely,  if we were to conclude that sufficient offsetting credit enhancements are, in  our opinion, not likely to be forthcoming, we would likely change the outlook  to negative to mirror the negative outlooks of France and Austria. Under those  circumstances we would expect to lower the ratings on the EFSF if we lowered  the long-term sovereign credit ratings on the EFSF's 'AAA' or 'AA+' rated  members to below 'AA+'."</em></blockquote>
So where do we go from here? <br /><br />
<strong><em><a href="http://moneymorning.com/2012/01/20/crisis-in-the-eurozone-the-reality-of-the-european-downgrades/" target="_self">To continue reading,  please click here...</a></em></strong><br /><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.macroaxis.com/2012/01/20/crisis-in-the-eurozone-the-reality-of-the-european-downgrades/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What the Next Decade Holds for Commodities</title>
		<link>http://blog.macroaxis.com/2012/01/20/what-the-next-decade-holds-for-commodities/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.macroaxis.com/2012/01/20/what-the-next-decade-holds-for-commodities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 10:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guest Editorial</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commodities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Morning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneymorning.com/?p=61910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What a  decade!... A rapidly urbanizing global population driven by tremendous growth  in emerging markets has sent commodities on quite a run over the past 10 years.<br /><br />
In fact,  you would find that all 14 commodities are in positive territory if you  annualized the returns since 2002.<br /><br />
The best  performer was silver with an impressive 20% annualized return.<br /><br />
Surprisingly,  that was higher 19% annual return on gold. <br /><br />
Notably,  all commodities except natural gas outperformed the S&#038;P 500 Index 10-year  annualized return of just 2.92%.<br /><br />
However,  last year did not seem reflective of the decade-long clamor for commodities.<br /><br />
In 2011,  only four commodities we track increased: gold (10%), oil (8%), coal (nearly  6%), and corn (nearly 3%). <br /><br />
The  remaining commodities listed on our popular <a target="_blank" href="http://www.usfunds.com/media/files/pdfs/researchreports/2012-research-reports/2011-CommoditiesRetail_JAN2012.pdf?CFID=2939205&#38;CFTOKEN=46438363">Periodic  Table of Commodity Returns</a> fell, with losses ranging from nearly 10% for  silver to 32% for natural gas.<br /><br />
I think  this chart is a "must-have" for investors and advisors because you can visually  see how commodities have fluctuated from year to year...<br /><br />
<strong><em><a href="http://moneymorning.com/2012/01/20/what-the-next-decade-holds-for-commodities/" target="_self">To  continue reading, please click here...</a></em></strong><br /><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.macroaxis.com/2012/01/20/what-the-next-decade-holds-for-commodities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>QE3, $2,200 Gold, and the Trillion Dollar Bazooka</title>
		<link>http://blog.macroaxis.com/2012/01/20/qe3-2200-gold-and-the-trillion-dollar-bazooka/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.macroaxis.com/2012/01/20/qe3-2200-gold-and-the-trillion-dollar-bazooka/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 10:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Krauth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[$2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[200 gold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commodities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EFSF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gold Investing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IMF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Morning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Premium Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCGLY]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneymorning.com/?p=61935</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's the beginning of a new year, and there's no  shortage of big headlines...<br /><br />
Europe is on the financial brink, Iran is a  powder keg, and precious metals like gold have retreated.<br /><br />
It's also a time when there is no shortage of  financial forecasts. <br /><br />
Even though these kinds of predictions about the  future can be tough to make, I'll admit it's kind of fun to look forward and  see what the future may hold.<br /><br />
Like in December 2010, when I said I expected<a target="_blank" href="http://moneymorning.com/2010/12/02/gold-price-forecast-four-reasons-the-yellow-metal-will-hit-1900-an-ounce-in-2011/"> gold to reach $1,900/oz</a> in 2011.  Some people thought that I was crazy.  At the time, gold was trading for just $1,390/oz.<br /><br />
But just nine months later, that turned out to be  a pretty good call as gold hit a new high of $1,923/oz. before eventually  pulling back. <br /><br />
Better yet, in January 2010, I even said <a target="_blank" href="http://moneymorning.com/2010/01/14/gold-superspike/">gold would eventually  top $5,000</a>. Of course, most people  thought that call was preposterous. <br /><br />
Now, even Standard Chartered bank's analysts  expect gold to climb to $5,000. <br /><br />
<strong><em><a href="http://moneymorning.com/2012/01/20/qe3-2200-gold-and-the-trillion-dollar-bazooka/" target="_self">To continue reading, please click here...</a></em></strong><br /><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.macroaxis.com/2012/01/20/qe3-2200-gold-and-the-trillion-dollar-bazooka/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: blog.macroaxis.com @ 2012-02-09 12:36:37 -->
